Nutrient Contents in Vegetables and Fruit are on the Decline
What is the evidence for the declining nutrient contents in vegetables and fruit?
It has been known by the U.S. Government as far back as 1936 that the nutrient contents in vegetables and fruit was slowly
declining. In fact Senate Document #264 tells us this.
Today modern farming methods are depleting the soils of the necessary nutrients that keep us healthy. If our soils are becoming
depleted of necessary nutrients, then it stands to reason that the nutrient contents in vegetables and fruit are declining as well.
The nutrient contents in vegetables and fruit are what keep us healthy. Are scientists telling us to stop eating vegetables and
fruit? Absolutely not.
Even though the nutrient contents in vegetables and fruit are on the decline, vegetables and fruit are still a good source of
vitamins and minerals.
Now the question is - because of the declining nutrient contents in vegetables and fruit, do I need nutritional
supplements?
None other than Harvard School of Public Health weighed in by stating that the, "... intake of several vitamins above the minimum daily
requirement may prevent heart disease, cancer, osteoporosis, and other chronic diseases."
Also, an article appearing in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) had this to say: "…suboptimal intake of some vitamins, above levels
causing classic vitamin deficiency, is a risk factor for chronic diseases and common in the general population..."
In addition, the JAMA went on to say, "Most people do not consume an optimal amount of all vitamins by diet alone. Pending strong
evidence of effectiveness from randomized trials, it appears prudent for all adults to take vitamin supplements."
Seeing the evidence for declining nutrient contents in vegetables and fruit, nutritional supplements are something we might want
to consider.
I have reproduced an article on the declining nutrient contents in vegetables and fruit. I have reproduced it here because
I am afraid that the link will eventually disappear and the article is just too valuable to lose.
You will find the original article at Scripps Howard News Service by clicking on the link below:
Scripps Howard News Service
Below is the article that outlines the evidence for the declining nutrient contents in vegetables and fruit.
--------------------------------------
Nutrient content in veggies declines amid bigger yields
By LANCE GAY
Scripps Howard News Service
27-FEB-06
In spite of what Mother taught you about the benefits of eating broccoli, data collected by the federal government shows that the
nutritional content of America's vegetables and fruits has declined over the last 50 years _ in some cases dramatically.
Donald Davis, a biochemist at the University of Texas in Austin, said that of 13 major nutrients in fruits and vegetables tracked
by the U.S. Department of Agriculture from 1950 to 1999, six showed noticeable declines.
The six declining nutrients included protein, calcium, phosphorus, iron, riboflavin and vitamin C. The declines ranged from 6
percent for protein, 15 percent for iron, 20 percent for vitamin C, and 38 percent for riboflavin.
"It's an amazing thing," said Davis, adding that the decline in nutrient content has not been widely noticed.
He said an agriculture scientist appears to have been the first to pick up the disappearance of nutrients in 1981 in a paper
comparing the data on nutrients on garden crops grown in the United States with those grown in England.
Davis, who discussed his findings at a recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in St.
Louis, suspects the trend in agriculture toward encouraging crops that grow the fastest and biggest is a reason for the decline. The last five
decades have been marked by the "Green Revolution," which has seen a marked increase in U.S. production and yields as farmers have turned to the
fastest-growing and greatest-producing plants.
The tradeoff is that the faster-growing plants aren't able to acquire the nutrients that their slower-growing cousins can, either
by synthesis or from the soil. He said there also are differences in the amounts of nutrients lost in differing varieties of wheat and
broccoli.
Davis said he doesn't want his study to encourage people to stop eating vegetables on the grounds they lack nutrients.
"That's completely wrong," he said, contending his study shows that people need to eat more vegetables and fruits, and not less.
"Vegetables are extraordinarily rich in nutrients and beneficial phytochemicals. They are still there, and vegetables and fruits are our best
sources for these."
Al Bushway, a food-science professor at the University of Maine and an expert on fruits and vegetables with the Institute of Food
Technologists, said the decline of nutrients in vegetables and fruits could be made up through other foods Americans eat.
"For vegans only using plant sources for food, this could be an issue," he said. But he said most Americans would pick up
adequate quantities of calcium they need by drinking milk.
Bushway said that fruits and vegetables are still crucial to providing nutrients people need. "They are an important part of the
diet _ extremely important,'' he said.
The Agriculture Department data that Davis used doesn't include all of the nutrients scientists today can identify in fruits and
vegetables. Scientists in the 1950s did not understand the role of phytochemicals, and other important nutrients, like magnesium, zinc and
Vitamin B-6, were not counted in the data scientists collected until more recent times.
(Contact Lance Gay at GayL(at)SHNS.com.
You will find the original article at Scripps Howard News Service by clicking on the link below:
Scripps Howard News Service
|